FILE - Danish-German businesswoman Corinna Larsen, who identifies herself as Corinna zu Sayn-Wittgenstein, attends a fashion show on Sept 8, 2014, in New York. Former Spanish King Juan Carlos I has won his London court battle with an ex-lover who sought $153 million in damages for allegedly being harassed and spied after their breakup. Danish socialite and businessperson Corinna Larsen, also known as Corinna zu Sayn-Wittgenstein said the former monarch caused her “great mental pain” by orchestrating threats and ordering unlawful covert and overt surveillance of her. A London judge tossed out her case and ruled that British courts don't have jurisdiction over the case because Larsen hadn't proved the harassment occurred in England and the king doesn't live there. (Photo by Mark Von Holden/Invision/AP, File)

LONDON (AP) — Former Spanish King Juan Carlos I won his London court battle Friday with an ex-lover who had sought 126 million pounds ($153 million) in damages for allegedly being harassed and spied on by him after their breakup.

Danish socialite and businessperson Corinna Larsen, also known as Corinna zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn, said the former monarch caused her “great mental pain” by orchestrating threats and ordering unlawful covert and overt surveillance of her. Larsen was Juan Carlos’ mistress from 2004 to 2009, the court said.

Juan Carlos, 85, who abdicated in 2014, denied wrongdoing and disputed the allegations, arguing that an English court didn’t have jurisdiction to hear the case because he doesn’t live in Britain. He has a home in Spain but currently lives in Abu Dhabi.

High Court Justice Rowena Collins Rice threw out the lawsuit after agreeing with the king. She added that Larsen, who owns homes in England, had not adequately shown that the harassment occurred in Britain, which could have provided an exception to the jurisdiction legal principle.

The king issued a statement saying that while he regretted the expense and time spent over three years, he welcomed the decision and claimed it “unsurprisingly” confirmed his innocence.

But the judge specifically said she had not considered the substance of Larsen’s claims because she was only concerned with whether the king could be forced to face trial in England.

“The claimant has an account she wishes to give of her personal and financial history with the defendant, and about the harm he has caused her peace of mind and personal wellbeing, and her business, social and family life,” Collins Rice said in the 92-page decision. “I take no view about that account as such.”

Larsen said in a statement that she was disappointed with the outcome and was considering her options.

“It is disheartening to see that victims of harassment often struggle to find justice in our legal system,” she said. "Juan Carlos has deployed his full armory to grind me down and the reach of his power is immense.”

The ruling comes 10 months after a U.K. appeals court panel tossed out part of the lawsuit on the grounds that some of the alleged harassment took place before Juan Carlos abdicated in 2014 and therefore he had immunity as a former head of state.

Friday's ruling dealt a blow to the remaining elements of the lawsuit.

Juan Carlos was once one of Spain’s most respected public figures for his role in the country’s return to democracy following the death of dictator Francisco Franco in 1975. But scandals involving Spain’s royal family began to mount in the later years of his reign, leading him to step down in favor of his son, King Felipe VI.

Juan Carlos suggested in his statement that after refraining from public comment during the case, he would now be free to make public appearances.

___

Ciarán Giles in Madrid contributed.

News from © The Associated Press, 2023