Subscribe

Would you like to subscribe to our newsletters?

BC landlord to pay year's rent after renoviction

Two people were awarded a year's worth of rent after a new buyer evicted them from their Coquitlam home (shown in this 2009 image). It was demolished later that year.
Two people were awarded a year's worth of rent after a new buyer evicted them from their Coquitlam home (shown in this 2009 image). It was demolished later that year.
Image Credit: GOOGLE

A BC landlord was ordered to pay a year's worth of rent to former tenants after they were evicted and told the landlord would be moving in.

Aesuk Kim bought the Coquitlam house in 2021, where William McMaster and Cynthia Wohlford were renting for $2,559 per month.

Kim told them she would be moving in and they had two months to move out, according to a recent BC Supreme Court decision.

READ MORE: Kelowna residents need to earn almost $36 an hour to afford rent

The former tenants checked on the property and found it was boarded up and torn down less than three months after Kim was supposed to be living there, according to the decision.

An arbitrator for the Residential Tenancy Branch found Kim took "no steps" to move into the property after she bought it, according to the decision.

Kim was ordered to pay $30,708 to McMaster and Wohlford by the Residential Tenancy Branch in a May 2022 decision, but she challenged the order in BC Supreme Court.

Kim claimed she decided to tear down the home after finding asbestos, lead and other dangerous chemicals inside, which she did move back into once it was rebuilt.

READ MORE: Kamloops, Kelowna bucking national trend of falling housing starts

But the need to demolish the house isn't the reason she took the appeal to court.

McMaster and Wohlford's notice of dispute was mailed to Kim's former North Vancouver home, but they were not aware she sold that home. It was never returned to the sender.

Kim claimed she was not given advance notice of the tenancy branch hearing dates, but then missed multiple deadlines to appeal that decision.

READ MORE: Mother suspected of abducting son and daughter spotted in Kamloops

She only learned there was a ruling against her in August 2022 when the Land Title and Survey Authority send a certificate of judgment to her business address in Port Coquitlam, she said.

Justice Christopher Hinkson dismissed Kim's appeal because she should have appealed within 60 days, rather than the 150 days she waited to file for a review.


To contact a reporter for this story, email Levi Landry or call 250-819-3723 or email the editor. You can also submit photos, videos or news tips to the newsroom and be entered to win a monthly prize draw.

We welcome your comments and opinions on our stories but play nice. We won't censor or delete comments unless they contain off-topic statements or links, unnecessary vulgarity, false facts, spam or obviously fake profiles. If you have any concerns about what you see in comments, email the editor in the link above. SUBSCRIBE to our awesome newsletter here.