Appeals court rejects challenge to Mueller's appointment
Michael Balsamo And Jessica Gresko
FILE - In this Aug. 10, 2018 file photo, Paul Kamenar, attorney for Andrew Miller, joined by Peter Flaherty, chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center, left, talks to reporters after a federal judge found Miller in contempt for refusing to testify before the grand jury hearing evidence in special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, at the District Court in Washington. A federal appeals court panel has rejected a challenge to special counsel Robert Mueller's appointment in a grand jury subpoena case. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
February 26, 2019 - 8:54 AM
WASHINGTON - A federal appeals court panel on Tuesday upheld Robert Mueller's appointment as special counsel after his authority was challenged by a witness who had refused to appear before a grand jury related to the Russia investigation.
The case was brought by Andrew Miller, an aide to longtime Trump campaign adviser and confidant Roger Stone. Prosecutors wanted Miller to testify as part of Mueller's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and ties to President Donald Trump's campaign.
Miller's attorneys claimed Mueller's appointment was unconstitutional, making the grand jury subpoena invalid. They argued that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein did not have the authority to appoint Mueller to lead the investigation.
The court found that Rosenstein was authorized to appoint Mueller because he technically became head of the Justice Department — for the Russia probe — after then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself from overseeing the investigation. The opinion by a three-judge panel was written by Judge Judith Rogers, who was nominated to the court by President Bill Clinton.
Four separate federal judges have upheld Mueller's appointment.
A federal judge ordered Miller to be jailed in August for contempt for refusing to testify, but the order was put on hold while he pursued an appeal.
In a statement, Miller's attorney Paul Kamenar said he was disappointed with Tuesday's ruling and was considering appealing to the full appellate court or the Supreme Court.
Kamenar noted that the court took longer to rule on Miller's appeal than it did on another challenge to a grand jury subpoena. That one, by an unidentified foreign corporation, is now before the Supreme Court.
"The fact that the court took over three months to decide this appeal after oral argument compared to the three days it took in December to decide another challenge to a Mueller subpoena issued to an unnamed foreign corporation, demonstrates that this was a serious and substantial challenge," he said.
Stone was arrested last month and has pleaded not guilty to charges he lied to Congress, engaged in witness tampering and obstruction. The charges stem from conversations he had during the campaign about WikiLeaks, the anti-secrecy group that released material stolen from Democratic groups, including Hillary Clinton's campaign.
After Stone's indictment, Kamenar said prosecutors still want Miller to appear before a grand jury as part of the investigation.
Associated Press writer Chad Day contributed to this report.
Read the ruling: http://apne.ws/TPhq2ld
Read AP's coverage of the Russia probe: https://apnews.com/TrumpInvestigations
News from © The Associated Press, 2019