Justices take up fight over refunding fees in criminal cases

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court will decide whether people convicted of crimes but later exonerated can get a refund of court fees and other costs.

The justices said Thursday they'll take up a case involving two Colorado defendants assessed thousands of dollars in processing charges and restitution costs after being convicted on sexual assault charges.

Both ultimately had their convictions thrown out on appeal, but a trial court declined to reimburse the money. Shannon Nelson was assessed $8,192 in costs and Louis Alonzo Madden was assessed $4,413.

A Colorado appeals court said state law required a full refund. But the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that costs could be returned only if they proved their innocence by clear and convincing evidence. Nelson and Madden say this violates their due process rights.

letters-to-the-editor
Vernon RCMP Supt. responds to 'RISK IT OUT'
Editor,   I am concerned by significant inaccuracies that could compromise both officer and public safety, in the November 30th Infonews article by Charlotte Helston on RCMP staffing in Vernon. To set the record straight, I do
Editor's Note in response to allegations from Vernon RCMP Supt. Jim McNamara
Editor’s note: • Watch shifts at the Vernon detachment have fallen as low as three roadable officers. • The department suffers from chronic understaffing. • Sources, who we trust and who have knowledge of the situ

Top News