SACRAMENTO, Calif. - An attorney representing two Sacramento, California, police officers said Tuesday they acted reasonably and were protecting the community when they fatally shot a knife-wielding, mentally disturbed black man in July.
Legal experts, meanwhile, said a dashboard camera recording of the two officers discussing hitting Joseph Mann with their police car before appearing to try to run him down does not make it more likely that they will face criminal charges in the shooting.
Officers John Tennis and Randy Lozoya were trying to knock down 50-year-old Joseph Mann with the patrol car, not kill him, attorney Judith Odbert said in a lengthy written statement.
They hoped "to take the subject off his feet to prevent the need for any other force to be deployed," the statement said.
When that didn't work, the two officers left their vehicle and shot Mann 14 times.
Odbert said Mann was "throwing items at them, he was intentionally defiant and moving aggressively towards officers with his weapon."
"Mr. Mann was not an unarmed black male minding his own business and shot for racial reasons," she wrote in the statement.
Mann's relatives have called for a federal civil rights investigation and said the two officers should be charged with murder.
John Burris, an attorney for the family, said the account by Odbert directly contradicts what video recordings show about the incident.
"She must be blind," Burris said. "The videotape clearly shows that he was standing still and pointing in the direction of the officers and they ran up on him without any escalation.
"Regardless of what they think or said this shooting was unjustified," Burris said.
He previously said Tennis and Lozoya acted like "big game hunters closing in on an animal."
Odbert called Burris' allegations that the officers set out to kill Mann "character assassination" and said the officers acted because they feared Mann was moving toward an area with more people.
Odbert said the two officers are not racist. Tennis is white and Lozoya is Latino, and both have mixed-race children, she said.
Prosecutors will have to evaluate the use of the police car and subsequent shooting to determine whether force was justified in each case, said Philip Stinson, an associate professor in the criminal justice program at Bowling Green State University in Ohio.
The officers may have reasonably feared for their lives or public safety, justifying any decision to use their vehicle to hit the man, he said.
"If you and I mowed somebody over, prosecutors would start with the assumption it was murder or manslaughter and work back from there," he said. "With a police officer, the assumption they start with is, 'Was this a justified use of deadly force?'"
The officers can be heard on the recording saying, "I'm gonna hit him" and "OK, go for it" before appearing to drive their cruiser twice at Mann, who managed to scramble out of its way both times. The officers then stopped the cruiser, got out and pursued Mann on foot.
Police found a knife but no gun after Mann was killed.
"It's ugly, but it's not necessarily illegal," Jonathan Blanks, a researcher at the Cato Institute who studies police prosecutions, said about the attempt to use the police vehicle to stop Mann. "At the heat of the moment, you're angered, your adrenaline's going up, if you think this guy is a danger you're not going to necessarily go in there with kid gloves."
Blanks pointed to a case in Arizona last year in which a police officer rammed an armed suspect who police say had embarked on a daylong crime spree before stealing a rifle and shooting it in the air near businesses. The encounter was also captured on a dashboard camera.
An internal review by the Marana Police Department just north of Tucson found that Officer Michael Rapiejko acted swiftly and correctly, and prosecutors declined to charge him.
Prosecutors rarely file charges against police officers in part because legal rulings have given police leeway in the use of lethal force, Blanks said.
When prosecutors do file charges, officers are rarely convicted.
"Police officers have a hero's halo in the minds of many Americans," said Jody Armour, a criminal law professor at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law.
In the Sacramento case, the officers could plausibly argue they thought the suspect had a gun, so they used their vehicles to protect themselves and the public, Armour said.
Thanawala reported from San Francisco. Associated Press writer Alison Noon also contributed to this story.